[Menvi-discuss] Conscious Playing Versus Muscle Memory

Marda marda-pianist at sbcglobal.net
Wed Apr 3 23:57:22 EDT 2013


When I took accompanying in college we had a book called "The Unashamed 
Accompanist".  One of its premises was that an accompanist goes alongside 
the soloist as an equal member of a team of two.  It's rather like in a 
chamber ensemble.  You listen to each other.Some singers use that thing 
about the accompanist just following the soloist as an excuse for not 
knowing proper rhythms and tempi.  When a composer writes a piece he's not 
just writing an accompaniment as window dressing for a soloist.  Of course 
the soloist is more dominant but both are responsible for accuracy of the 
music.  A good accompanist doesn't just follow a soloist.
Marda
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bettie Downing" <bnbdowning70 at embarqmail.com>
To: "This is for discussing music and braille literacy" 
<menvi-discuss at menvi.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Menvi-discuss] Conscious Playing Versus Muscle Memory



A good accompanist listens to the vocalist and follows him.  The
soloiist is responsible for setting the tempo.


On Apr 3, 2013, at 9:29 PM, Brandon Keith Biggs wrote:

> I wonder how good this is when one thinks too fast... I have the  hardest 
> time when singing with a live pianist because I'm never  able to link into 
> their rhythm and when I go to hear their rhythm,  they slow down because 
> it sounds like I'm slowing down... So I  wonder if this has something to 
> do with the speed we are processing.
> I know my piece implicitly, but have very little knowledge of the 
> pianist, and the pianist doesn't know the piece that much, but is  just 
> reacting with me.
> Thanks,
>
> Brandon Keith Biggs
> -----Original Message----- From: Chris Smart
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 1:26 PM
> To: blind-guitarist at yahoogroups.com
> Cc: midimag at midimag.org ; menvi-discuss at menvi.org
> Subject: [Menvi-discuss] Conscious Playing Versus Muscle Memory
>
> Hi folks.
>
> I just read the following from a book by Mac
> Santiago, called Beyond the Metronome.
> www.inchronicity.com
>
> "People basically execute movement in two
> different ways (or a combination of both). These
> are cognitive responses and reactive responses.
> The cognitive response is movement that you
> consciously set in motion by telling yourself to
> perform an act. Most of the time this happens
> when executing an action for the first time. With
> cognitive response the actual signal from brain
> to muscle moves at about three meters per second
> or from head to hand in about a third of a second
> (10 11 km/hour). This is why practicing slowly at
> first helps you to learn any movement or music
> correctly, and eliminates poor or inaccurate motor responses.
>
> Now as you learn the movement and your muscles
> begin to take over (some call this “muscle
> memory”), what is actually happening is that the
> signal from your brain to your muscle becomes
> quicker, or reactive. At this point the signal is
> moving at about 70 100 meters a second, so about
> 1/100 of a second from head to hands (250 350
> km/hour). As you can see, the two responses are vastly different.
>
> With this information I believe that timekeeping
> can be viewed as an indication of how much the
> performance has become a reactive response. This
> is also a measure of how familiar one is with the
> music. The great jazz alto saxophonist Charlie
> Parker once said, “I want to be able to play as
> fast as I can think.” When one listens to Parker
> with the above science in mind, it’s apparent
> that he was, in fact, extremely reactive to every
> musical thought that came into his mind. The
> speed and clarity with which he played made it
> seem as though his mind and body were one and the same.
> This is the goal for all musicians—to unify
> thought and execution seamlessly."
>
> I've always observed that one can play something
> faster once one knows it inside and out, but it
> was fascinating to see actual numbers given.  A
> third of a second versus one one-hundredth of a
> second... That would have been good to learn
> years ago when I was starting out. :)
>
> Chris
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> CTS MASTERING, affordable and professional mixing
> and mastering: http://www.ctsmastering.com
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/#!/CTSMASTERING
> BLOG: www.ctsmastering.com/blog
> Linked In: http://ca.linkedin.com/pub/chris-smart/46/824/536
> Dropbox, Share Files Easily: http://db.tt/bQ2GuIt
>
>
> Thank you for subscribing to MENVI.  Should you wish to  unsubscribe, 
> change your delivery, or set any other options  available to you, please 
> view the list information page below.   Should you have any questions, 
> please contact the owner of the list.
> _______________________________________________
> Menvi-discuss mailing list
> Menvi-discuss at menvi.org
> http://menvi.org/mailman/listinfo/menvi-discuss_menvi.org
>
> Thank you for subscribing to MENVI.  Should you wish to  unsubscribe, 
> change your delivery, or set any other options  available to you, please 
> view the list information page below.   Should you have any questions, 
> please contact the owner of the list.
> _______________________________________________
> Menvi-discuss mailing list
> Menvi-discuss at menvi.org
> http://menvi.org/mailman/listinfo/menvi-discuss_menvi.org


Thank you for subscribing to MENVI.  Should you wish to unsubscribe, change 
your delivery, or set any other options available to you, please view the 
list information page below.  Should you have any questions, please contact 
the owner of the list.
_______________________________________________
Menvi-discuss mailing list
Menvi-discuss at menvi.org
http://menvi.org/mailman/listinfo/menvi-discuss_menvi.org 





More information about the Menvi-discuss mailing list