<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-GB link=blue vlink=purple style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>My preference would be 2 lines.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>I have put it to Humanware that it wouldn’t take a huge reconfigure to squeeze in a second line of dots, use the same routing keys above for both lines with just an extra button at the end that toggles the routing keys for top or bottom line.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>I think all the non musicians out there just think I’m mad and say that in a market that has so few purchasers anyway to further narrow it to those who do music and want two lines would never fly.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>I can see some use for the Canute if you need to edit chamber music or orchestral scores, but for just reading them, I think an embosser is a better option and have hard copy than something so big and heavy and non portable, it is less portable than a Braille book.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>But I would love those two lines for piano, violin duets, melody with chords, melody plus lyrics, etc.<o:p></o:p></span></p><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US> Menvi-discuss <b>On Behalf Of </b>Ella Yu via Menvi-discuss<br><b>Sent:</b> Friday, June 9, 2023 6:06 PM<br><b>To:</b> This is for discussing music and braille literacy <menvi-discuss@menvi.org><br><b>Cc:</b> Ella Yu <ellaxyu@gmail.com><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Menvi-discuss] Question about preference for multi line Braille display<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>Hi Chris, this is a very good and interesting question. Keep in mind, I have never tried a multi-line braille display before, so it'd be useful for those who have tried a multi-line display to chime in at some point. I agree that for piano music in particular, the odd number of lines can definitely cause potential havoc. That said, an odd number of staves would be less of a problem for, say, organ music, which has three staves (though there are far fewer people who play the organ so optimizing it for piano makes sense in a way). Some chamber music and orchestral scores will have odd numbers of lines depending on how many instruments are in a particular score, but again, it depends.<o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 10:55 PM Chris Cooke via Menvi-discuss <<a href="mailto:menvi-discuss@menvi.org">menvi-discuss@menvi.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm'><p class=MsoNormal>Hi, all. I was discussing the merits of having a multi-line Braille display. The displays that are currently out there have an odd number of lines, including the Canute 360. I was thinking it would be better to have an even number of lines so that if you are a keyboard player, you would have a complete set of right and left hand sets on the display. Do you think a Braille display with an even number of lines or not would be a dealbreaker for you? Thanks,<br>Chris <br><br>Chris<br>---------<br><br>Thank you for subscribing to MENVI. Should you wish to unsubscribe, change your delivery, or set any other options available to you, please view the list information page below. Should you have any questions, please contact the owner of the list.<br>_______________________________________________<br>Menvi-discuss mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Menvi-discuss@menvi.org" target="_blank">Menvi-discuss@menvi.org</a><br><a href="http://mail.menvi.org/mailman/listinfo/menvi-discuss_menvi.org" target="_blank">http://mail.menvi.org/mailman/listinfo/menvi-discuss_menvi.org</a><o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div></div></body></html>